Moral luck: why we blame the unlucky drunk driver more

Moral luck: why we blame the unlucky drunk driver more

Bernard Williams and Thomas Nagel on the puzzle that we judge people for outcomes partly beyond their control — and how it threatens the whole idea of moral responsibility.

Listen in the Fylom app.

Show notes

The control principle argues that moral responsibility should only apply to factors within an individual's direct control.

Resultant luck causes society to blame a reckless driver more if they happen to hit a pedestrian.

Circumstantial luck means a person's moral record often depends on the specific historical era they inhabit.

Constitutive luck suggests that inherited traits like empathy or a short fuse are largely matters of chance.

Legal systems often punish successful crimes more harshly than attempted ones despite identical intent.

Scientific views of causal luck can make human agency appear to vanish under physics and biology.

In this episode
  1. 01Intro1 min
  2. 02The Control Principle and the Kantian Ideal2 min
  3. 03Resultant and Circumstantial Luck3 min
  4. 04Constitutive and Causal Luck3 min
  5. 05The Paradox of Moral Assessment3 min
  6. 06Outro1 min
Sources
Your turn

Fylom generates episodes like this on any topic you're curious about.

Fylom episodes are researched, written, and voiced by AI. Automated checks help catch inaccuracies, but episodes aren't reviewed by a human and AI can still get things wrong. Treat them as a starting point, not a source of record — more in our accuracy disclaimer.