Fylom
Back to Crime, courts & justice
The Nuremberg trials and the invention of crimes against humanity

Crime, courts & justice

The Nuremberg trials and the invention of crimes against humanity

12 min

After World War II, the world faced an unprecedented question: how do you put a regime on trial? Trace how Nuremberg built the legal machinery for prosecuting atrocity and shaped international law ever since.

Listen on the app, request early access:

Show notes

The London Charter established the International Military Tribunal to replace summary executions with formal legal proceedings.

Hersch Lauterpacht shifted international law by prioritizing individual human rights over the traditional shield of state sovereignty.

The war nexus compromise initially limited crimes against humanity prosecutions to actions taken during wartime.

Prosecutors relied on captured Nazi documentation and film footage rather than witness testimony to secure convictions.

The Nuremberg trials rejected the superior orders defense and established individual responsibility for international crimes.

Control Council Law Number Ten eventually allowed for the prosecution of atrocities committed during peacetime.

In this episode

  1. 1Intro1 min
  2. 2The Legal Vacuum of 19452 min
  3. 3Hersch Lauterpacht and the Individual3 min
  4. 4The Trial of the Major War Criminals3 min
  5. 5The Nuremberg Legacy and the Rome Statute3 min
  6. 6Outro1 min

Sources

Fylom generates episodes like this on any topic you're curious about.

Fylom episodes are researched and written by AI. Automated checks help catch inaccuracies, but episodes aren't reviewed by a human and AI can still get things wrong. Treat them as a starting point, not a source of record — more in our accuracy disclaimer.

The Nuremberg trials and the invention of crimes against humanity — Fylom