
The Tsar's Bones and the DNA That Ended a Dynasty Myth
For decades, Anna Anderson claimed to be Grand Duchess Anastasia, winning followers and sparking legal battles that lasted until 1970. When the Romanov family's graves were finally found and tested using mitochondrial DNA, the science delivered a verdict no court had managed in seventy years. This is the story of how forensic labs settled one of history's most enduring identity disputes.
Listen in the Fylom app.
Anna Anderson claimed a compassionate guard smuggled her away from the nineteen eighteen Romanov execution site.
A thirty-two year German court case failed to definitively prove or disprove Anderson's royal identity.
Mitochondrial DNA from Prince Philip provided the genetic link to identify the remains of Tsarina Alexandra.
The discovery of a second grave in two thousand seven accounted for the two missing Romanov children.
Advanced DNA testing on hospital tissue samples proved Anna Anderson was actually factory worker Franziska Schanzkowska.
Multi-system genetic analysis officially confirmed that no members of the Romanov family survived the Ipatiev House.
- 01Intro1 min
- 02The Woman from the Canal2 min
- 03The Seventy-Year Trial2 min
- 04The Grave in the Woods3 min
- 05Closing the Case3 min
- 06Outro1 min
- Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolaevna of Russia - Wikipedia
- Anna Anderson - Wikipedia
- Anna Anderson - Top 10 Imposters - Time.com
- The unsolved riddle of princess Anastasia
- Anna Anderson: The Great Imposter
- Eugenia Smith - Wikipedia
- Anastasia Romanov Imposters - True Story About Princess ...
- Identification of the remains of the Romanov family by DNA analysis - Nature Genetics
- The Identification of the Two Missing Romanov Children Using ...
- The Identification of the Two Missing Romanov Children Using DNA ...
- Identification of the remains of the Romanov family by DNA ...
Fylom generates episodes like this on any topic you're curious about.
Fylom episodes are researched, written, and voiced by AI. Automated checks help catch inaccuracies, but episodes aren't reviewed by a human and AI can still get things wrong. Treat them as a starting point, not a source of record — more in our accuracy disclaimer.