
Voters say National made the wrong call keeping Luxon, poll finds
An analysis of the RNZ-Reid Research poll showing a significant gap between National's caucus support for Christopher Luxon and public sentiment, exploring whether his leadership has become a liability ahead of the November 7 election.
Listen in the Fylom app.
Forty-five percent of voters believe the National Party made the wrong choice by retaining Christopher Luxon.
Luxon’s net approval rating has plummeted to negative twenty-two point nine percent.
Seventy-eight percent of National voters still support Luxon despite his widespread unpopularity with the general public.
Nearly forty percent of respondents could not identify a single preferred alternative leader for the party.
Labour currently holds a five percentage point lead over National as the November seventh election approaches.
National leadership survived two caucus confidence votes in twenty twenty-six despite half of voters reporting poor performance.
- 01Intro1 min
- 02The Polling Disconnect2 min
- 03The Approval Slump and Party Trajectory2 min
- 04Caucus Protection vs. Voter Reality2 min
- 05The Road to November Seventh2 min
- 06Outro1 min
- RNZ-Reid Research poll: Opportunity in kingmaker position, Luxon ...
- RNZ-Reid Research poll: Labour extends lead over National
- Did National make the wrong call in keeping Luxon? - NZ Herald
- RNZ-Reid Research poll: Bleak numbers for Luxon, but no ...
- Embattled New Zealand prime minister survives leadership vote and blames media for ‘soap opera’
- New Zealand's Luxon survives party vote that exposes cracks ahead ...
- Christopher Luxon's Post - LinkedIn
- New Zealand PM survives second leadership challenge ...
- NZ Prime Minister Christopher Luxon calls for election on November 7
- New Zealand PM Christopher Luxon calls national election ...
- 'We're not where we want to be' - Luxon on poll shocker
- New Zealand PM Christopher Luxon wins confidence vote, surviving ...
Fylom generates episodes like this on any topic you're curious about.
Fylom episodes are researched, written, and voiced by AI. Automated checks help catch inaccuracies, but episodes aren't reviewed by a human and AI can still get things wrong. Treat them as a starting point, not a source of record — more in our accuracy disclaimer.