The replication crisis in psychology

The replication crisis in psychology

When researchers tried to reproduce famous psychology experiments, a startling number failed. Explore which celebrated findings collapsed, which held up, and how the field is trying to fix how it does science.

Listen in the Fylom app.

Show notes

Only thirty-six percent of psychology studies successfully replicated with statistical significance in a major hundred-study project.

Replicated studies showed effect sizes that were less than half as strong as the original published findings.

Ego depletion and power posing theories failed to hold up under large-scale, rigorous replication efforts.

P-hacking allows researchers to manipulate data analysis until they reach the desired point zero five significance level.

The file drawer effect hides unsuccessful studies, leaving only misleadingly positive results in the public record.

Pre-registration prevents researchers from changing their hypotheses after they have already seen the data results.

In this episode
  1. 01Intro1 min
  2. 02The Reproducibility Project2 min
  3. 03The Fallen Giants: Ego Depletion and Power Posing3 min
  4. 04Why Science Breaks: P-Hacking and Incentives3 min
  5. 05The Path to Reform2 min
  6. 06Outro1 min
Sources
Your turn

Fylom generates episodes like this on any topic you're curious about.

Fylom episodes are researched, written, and voiced by AI. Automated checks help catch inaccuracies, but episodes aren't reviewed by a human and AI can still get things wrong. Treat them as a starting point, not a source of record — more in our accuracy disclaimer.