
Politics & power
Gerrymandering: how district lines decide elections
12 min
Before a single vote is cast, the way electoral maps are drawn can lock in outcomes for a decade. Explore how gerrymandering works, the math used to detect it, and the fight over who should draw the lines.
Listen on the app, request early access:
Show notes
Packing concentrates opposition voters into single districts to neutralize their surplus voting power.
Cracking dilutes opposition voters across multiple districts to prevent them from reaching a majority.
The efficiency gap measures partisan bias by calculating the difference in wasted votes between parties.
Mathematical sampling of twenty-four thousand alternative maps can prove if a district plan is an outlier.
The Massachusetts Paradox shows how geographic sorting can leave one-third of voters with zero representation.
Proportional ranked choice voting in multi-member districts reduces the incentive for partisan map manipulation.
In this episode
- 1Intro1 min
- 2The Mechanics of Cracking and Packing2 min
- 3The Random Walk: Math as a Yardstick3 min
- 4The Massachusetts Paradox and Racial Gerrymandering3 min
- 5Beyond the Lines: Structural Solutions2 min
- 6Outro1 min
Sources
- The political calculus—and actual math—of gerrymandering
- Q&A: The political calculus—and actual math—of gerrymandering
- Explainer: What's happening with gerrymandering in the ...
- Geometry Reveals the Tricks behind Gerrymandering | Scientific American
- Redistricting war accelerates winner-take-all politics straining American democracy | PBS News
- The Math of Gerrymandering. How Politicians Choose Their Voters | by Cole Frederick | Science Spectrum
- Gerrymandering - Institute for Mathematics and Democracy
- Congress in Plain English: Gerrymandering - UnderstandingCongress.org
- What to know about gerrymandering – That's Politics Podcast
- Gerrymandering: How drawing jagged lines can impact an | TED-Ed
- How to Quantify (and Fight) Gerrymandering | Quanta Magazine
- [PDF] 18-422 Rucho v. Common Cause (06/27/2019) - Supreme Court
- Partisan Gerrymandering and the Efficiency Gap
- Quantifying Gerrymandering in North Carolina
- Measuring partisan fairness
- Partisan Gerrymandering and the Efficiency Gap
- Measuring Efficiency in Redistricting
- How the New Math of Gerrymandering Works - The New York Times
- The Math Behind Gerrymandering and Wasted Votes | Quanta Magazine
- Recombination: A Family of Markov Chains for Redistricting · Issue 3.1, Winter 2021
- Introduction to Discrete MCMC for Redistricting
- https://export.arxiv.org/pdf/2209.00624v1.pdf
- How Math Has Changed the Shape of Gerrymandering | Quanta Magazine
- Carlo∗
- Don’t Trust a Single Gerrymandering Metric | La Matematica | Springer Nature Link
- [1709.01596] Evaluating Partisan Gerrymandering in Wisconsin
- 04 StephanopoulosMcGhee_ART_Final (ABF)
- [1705.10812] A formula goes to court: Partisan gerrymandering and the efficiency gap
Fylom generates episodes like this on any topic you're curious about.
Fylom episodes are researched and written by AI. Automated checks help catch inaccuracies, but episodes aren't reviewed by a human and AI can still get things wrong. Treat them as a starting point, not a source of record — more in our accuracy disclaimer.