The Woman Who Sued the King and Won
In 1700s England, a servant named Elizabeth Canning vanished for a month and returned claiming kidnapping, triggering one of the century's most divisive trials. The case split London into warring factions and exposed how flimsy testimony could send someone to the gallows or the colonies. This is the story of a lie so tangled that no one has ever fully unraveled it.
Listen in the Fylom app.
Eighteenth-century English law relied on private citizens rather than professional police to bring criminal charges.
Lord Mayor Crisp Gascoyne launched a private investigation that proved Mary Squires had a solid alibi.
London society split into warring factions called Canningites and Egyptians who fought via media pamphlets.
Judges rejected a compromise verdict of non-wilful falsehood and demanded a full conviction for perjury.
Elizabeth Canning was sentenced to seven years of transportation to America after her testimony was debunked.
The trial functioned as a performance of social reputation rather than a review of physical evidence.
- 01Intro1 min
- 02The Return of the Maid2 min
- 03The Mayor’s Doubt2 min
- 04The Pamphlet War2 min
- 05The Verdict of History3 min
- 06Outro1 min
- Elizabeth Canning - Wikipedia
- Print, Public Sympathy and Material Support Before the Law in Eighteenth-Century London: The Case of Elizabeth Canning
- Portal:London/Featured biography/17 - Wikipedia
- The Mysterious Affair of Elizabeth Canning | The British Newspaper Archive Blog
- The Press, the Public and Elizabeth Canning in Mid-Eighteenth-Century
- Dictionary of National Biography, 1885-1900/Canning, Elizabeth
- The Works of Henry Fielding/A Clear State of the Case of Elizabeth ...
- Making Sense of English Law Enforcement in the 18th ...
- Criminal trial
- Criminal trial | London Lives
Fylom generates episodes like this on any topic you're curious about.
Fylom episodes are researched, written, and voiced by AI. Automated checks help catch inaccuracies, but episodes aren't reviewed by a human and AI can still get things wrong. Treat them as a starting point, not a source of record — more in our accuracy disclaimer.