The Toddlers Who Chose the Marshmallow, Decades Later
A famous experiment claimed that a child's ability to delay eating one marshmallow predicted their success in life. Follow the story of what actually happened when researchers tracked those children into adulthood — and why a 2018 replication quietly rewrote the lesson everyone thought they'd learned.
Listen in the Fylom app.
Original marshmallow test findings were based on a small sample of privileged Stanford faculty children.
Controlling for family background reduces the link between waiting and later achievement by two-thirds.
Immediate consumption is a logical strategy for children living in resource-scarce or unstable environments.
A child's ability to wait reflects their trust in authority figures rather than fixed internal willpower.
Marshmallow test results at age four fail to predict success or achievement in adult life.
Neural markers for self-control remain consistent from childhood through middle age.
- 01Intro1 min
- 02The Bing Nursery School Origins3 min
- 03The Biological and Statistical Reckoning2 min
- 04The Adult Outcome Dead End2 min
- 05Outro1 min
- Stanford marshmallow experiment
- Revisiting the Marshmallow Test: A Conceptual Replication ...
- What Made the Marshmallow Test Famous—and Misleading
- 40-Year Follow-Up on Marshmallow Test Points to Biological ...
- The Bing “Marshmallow Studies”: 50 Years of Continuing Research
- The “marshmallow test” said patience was a key to success. A new replication tells us s’more.
- New Study Disavows Marshmallow Test's Predictive Powers
- Delay of gratification and adult outcomes: The Marshmallow ...
- Stanford marshmallow experiment | Health and Medicine
- Same Data Set, Different Conclusions: Preschool Delay of ... - NIH
- NYU Steinhardt Professor Replicates Famous Marshmallow Test ...
Fylom generates episodes like this on any topic you're curious about.
Fylom episodes are researched, written, and voiced by AI. Automated checks help catch inaccuracies, but episodes aren't reviewed by a human and AI can still get things wrong. Treat them as a starting point, not a source of record — more in our accuracy disclaimer.