
The 1966 Astroten Hoax: When Authority Overrides Safety
In 1966, psychiatrist Charles K. Hofling conducted a field experiment where an unknown caller posing as a doctor ordered nurses to administer a dangerous overdose of a fictitious drug. The results revealed how hospital hierarchies can override professional judgment and safety protocols.
Listen in the Fylom app.
Twenty-one out of twenty-two nurses complied with a dangerous order from a fictitious doctor.
Nurses administered double the maximum daily dose of Astroten despite clear warning labels.
A single telephone call from a stranger successfully bypassed multiple hospital safety protocols.
Professional nurses and students incorrectly predicted they would refuse the illegal orders in hypothetical scenarios.
The study exposed how rigid hospital hierarchies can silence professional logic and expertise.
Night shift isolation and psychological pressure made nurses more likely to follow unsafe verbal commands.
- 01Intro1 min
- 02The Midnight Call3 min
- 03The Astroten Dilemma3 min
- 04The Compliance Gap2 min
- 05The Shadow of the Sixties2 min
- 06Outro1 min
- Hofling Hospital Experiment of Obedience
- Hofling hospital experiment
- Conformity & Obedience #3 - Keith E Rice's Integrated SocioPsychology Blog & Pages
- The Hofling Hospital Experiment (Nurse Obedience)
- Experiment Variations
- Milgram's Obedience Study: Ethics and Impact - Scribd
- The Hofling Nurse Study
- Situational Factors AO1 AO2 AO3 - PSYCHOLOGY WIZARD
- 5. Verbal Orders and Hospital Nursing: Expanding Nurses' Scope of Practice in the Mid-Twentieth Century
- [PDF] Milgram and Tuskegee--paradigm research projects in bioethics.
- Nursing in the 1960’s: ‘The ward sisters were pretty fierce’
- Scanned by Scan2Net
- INTRODUCTION
Fylom generates episodes like this on any topic you're curious about.
Fylom episodes are researched, written, and voiced by AI. Automated checks help catch inaccuracies, but episodes aren't reviewed by a human and AI can still get things wrong. Treat them as a starting point, not a source of record — more in our accuracy disclaimer.